Phytomedicine
Volume 17, Issue 2 , Pages 87-93, February 2010

Rose hip herbal remedy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis – a randomised controlled trial

  • S.N. Willich

      Affiliations

    • Institute for Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charité University Medical Centre, Berlin, Germany
  • ,
  • K. Rossnagel

      Affiliations

    • Institute for Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charité University Medical Centre, Berlin, Germany
  • ,
  • S. Roll

      Affiliations

    • Institute for Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charité University Medical Centre, Berlin, Germany
  • ,
  • A. Wagner

      Affiliations

    • Institute for Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charité University Medical Centre, Berlin, Germany
  • ,
  • O. Mune

      Affiliations

    • Frederiksberg Hospital, Department of Clinical Biochemistry, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
  • ,
  • J. Erlendson

      Affiliations

    • Frederiksberg Hospital, Department of Clinical Biochemistry, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
  • ,
  • A. Kharazmi

      Affiliations

    • Frederiksberg Hospital, Department of Clinical Biochemistry, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
  • ,
  • H. Sörensen

      Affiliations

    • Institute for Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charité University Medical Centre, Berlin, Germany
  • ,
  • K. Winther

      Affiliations

    • Frederiksberg Hospital, Department of Clinical Biochemistry, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +4538164701.

published online 12 October 2009.

Abstract 

Objective

To investigate if standardised powder made from rose-hip (Rosa canina) can reduce the symptom score in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Methods

In a double-blind placebo-controlled trial, patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) according to ARA/ACR criteria were randomised to treatment with capsulated rose-hip powder 5g daily or matching placebo for 6 months at two outpatient clinics in Berlin and Copenhagen. Primary outcome variable was Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) at 6 months, secondary outcome included DAS-28, physician's global evaluation of disease activity, RAQoL, SF-12 and concomitant pain medication.

Results

In a total of 89 patients (90% female, mean age 56.6+11.3 years, mean disease duration 12.8+9.6 years) HAQ-DI in the rose-hip group improved by 0.105±0.346, whereas in the placebo group it worsened by 0.039±0.253 (p adjusted=0.032). In the HAQ Patient Pain Scale no significant differences were observed between both groups. In the HAQ Patient Global Scale a trend was seen favouring rose-hip (p=0.078). The DAS-28 score yielded improvement in the rose-hip group of 0.89±1.32 and in the placebo group of 0.34±1.27 (p=0.056) indicating moderate clinical relevance. The Physicians Global Scale demonstrated more improvement in the rose-hip compared to the placebo group (p=0.012). RAQoL and SF-12 physical score improved significantly in the rose-hip group compared to placebo, whereas SF-12 mental score remained unchanged. Intake of pain medication was not different between the groups. Per-protocol analysis confirmed these results.

Conclusion

The results indicate that patients with RA may benefit from additional treatment with rose hip powder.

Keywords: Rheumatoid arthritis, HAQ, Disability score, Quality of life, Rose hip, Rosa canina

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0944-7113(09)00231-1

doi:10.1016/j.phymed.2009.09.003

Phytomedicine
Volume 17, Issue 2 , Pages 87-93, February 2010